Educator resource / classroom ready

Teacher lesson pack

A flexible 60-minute forensic science lesson to help students observe, compare and reason from evidence. Adapt the activities to your class, curriculum and available resources.

Explore curriculum connections
Suggested length 60 minutesFormat Small-group investigationSuitable for Adaptable age groups
01 / Learning goals

By the end, students can…

  • Record careful observations and distinguish them from assumptions.
  • Compare evidence samples using consistent criteria.
  • Use findings to support, challenge or rule out an explanation.
  • Communicate a conclusion and identify the limits of the evidence.
02 / Prepare

What you’ll need

  • Printed evidence cards or teacher-prepared scenario cards
  • Observation and comparison worksheet or lined paper
  • Pens, pencils and a timer
  • Optional: magnifiers and printed fingerprint, fibre or shoe-tread images

Keep the activity classroom-safe: use images or teacher-prepared cards, not unknown substances or biological samples. Follow your school’s usual safety and safeguarding guidance.

UK curriculum reference

Map the investigation to your nation’s framework

These connections show how the lesson can generate evidence of scientific learning across the UK. Choose the framework for your setting, then check your local scheme of work and requirements.

England / Key Stage 3

National Curriculum for science

Curriculum focus: Working scientifically: experimental skills and investigations, analysis and evaluation, and developing scientific explanations.

Use the investigation to practise asking questions, making and recording observations, interpreting evidence and evaluating conclusions. It supports working scientifically; it is not a substitute for a required practical.

Evidence from this lesson: Students record observations, compare samples against shared criteria, use data to support a claim and identify evidence that could challenge it.

England science programmes of study ↗
Scotland / Experiences and Outcomes

Curriculum for Excellence: Sciences

Curriculum focus: Scientific inquiry and investigation skills, selected for the relevant CfE level and the class’s current progression.

The activity provides a context for planning an inquiry, gathering and analysing information, and communicating findings. Select the Experiences and Outcomes and Benchmarks that fit learners and local planning.

Evidence from this lesson: Teams share observations, compare findings, explain how they reached a conclusion and suggest what further investigation could test it.

Education Scotland: Sciences ↗
Wales / Area of Learning and Experience

Curriculum for Wales: Science and Technology

Curriculum focus: Progression in scientific inquiry: asking questions, investigating evidence and communicating explanations.

Use the fictional scenario as a flexible context for curiosity, investigation and interpretation. Connect the task to the school’s curriculum design, progression planning and relevant statements of what matters.

Evidence from this lesson: Learners distinguish what they observed from what they infer, discuss alternative explanations and describe uncertainty in their account.

Curriculum for Wales: Science and Technology ↗
Northern Ireland / Key Stage 3

Northern Ireland Curriculum: Science and Technology

Curriculum focus: Scientific enquiry alongside Thinking Skills and Personal Capabilities, including managing information and working with others.

The investigation can support enquiry, evidence handling and scientific communication. Map the activity to the relevant science content and skills in the school’s KS3 scheme of work.

Evidence from this lesson: Students organise observations, agree comparison criteria in a group and present a reasoned conclusion with its limitations.

CCEA: Key Stage 3 ↗

Curriculum frameworks and local plans vary. These are planning links, not a claim of formal accreditation or a replacement for a school’s curriculum documents.

03 / The investigation

A 60-minute lesson flow

Keep the evidence fictional and the focus on scientific reasoning. Timings are a guide; adjust them for your learners.

  1. 010–5 min

    Set the scene

    Introduce the fictional investigation and the central question. Establish that the class will work from observations, not guesses.

  2. 025–12 min

    Observe before interpreting

    Students inspect the evidence cards independently and write down only what they can directly see.

  3. 0312–27 min

    Compare and classify

    In small teams, students compare two or more samples using shared features such as pattern, shape, colour or visible marks.

  4. 0427–40 min

    Build an evidence-based account

    Teams organise their observations, discuss which explanations fit the evidence and note what remains uncertain.

  5. 0540–52 min

    Share and challenge

    Each team presents one claim, the observations supporting it and one limitation. Invite peers to ask how the evidence supports the conclusion.

  6. 0652–60 min

    Reflect and exit

    Students complete the reflection prompts and identify one new question they would investigate next.

04 / Discussion

Questions that deepen the analysis

  • Which details did your team observe directly?
  • What evidence supports your explanation, and what might contradict it?
  • Could another explanation fit the same observations?
  • What additional evidence would help you decide?
  • What can this evidence not tell you?
05 / Differentiation

Adapt for your class

Make it more accessible

Provide a short vocabulary bank, labelled evidence images and sentence starters such as “We observed…” and “This suggests…”.

Add challenge

Give teams a conflicting observation or incomplete evidence set. Ask them to explain how uncertainty changes their conclusion.

Connect to curriculum

Link the comparison task to classification, fair testing, material properties, data interpretation or evaluating scientific claims.

06 / Exit ticket

One-minute learner reflection

Ask students to answer these before they leave:

  1. What is one observation that changed your team’s thinking?
  2. How confident are you in your conclusion, and why?
  3. What further evidence would you want to collect?
Take it further

Bring a fully facilitated investigation to your school.

Share your learner age, course and goals with our team. We’ll help shape a suitable session and aim to respond within 48 hours.

Discuss a workshop ↗